Re: [PATCH] t9001: Fix test prerequisites

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Add in missing Perl prerequisites for new tests of send-email.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  t/t9001-send-email.sh |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Thanks.

> diff --git a/t/t9001-send-email.sh b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
> index 1dc4a92..3271426 100755
> --- a/t/t9001-send-email.sh
> +++ b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
> @@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ test_expect_success $PREREQ '--8bit-encoding also treats subject' '
>  # Note that the patches in this test are deliberately out of order; we
>  # want to make sure it works even if the cover-letter is not in the
>  # first mail.
> -test_expect_success 'refusing to send cover letter template' '
> +test_expect_success $PREREQ 'refusing to send cover letter template' '
>  	clean_fake_sendmail &&
>  	rm -fr outdir &&
>  	git format-patch --cover-letter -2 -o outdir &&
> @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ test_expect_success 'refusing to send cover letter template' '
>  	test -z "$(ls msgtxt*)"
>  '
>  
> -test_expect_success '--force sends cover letter template anyway' '
> +test_expect_success $PREREQ '--force sends cover letter template anyway' '
>  	clean_fake_sendmail &&
>  	rm -fr outdir &&
>  	git format-patch --cover-letter -2 -o outdir &&

This however makes me wonder (Robin, the following is primarily meant for
Ãvar to whom 57cd35e (t/t9001-send-email.sh: change from skip_all=* to
prereq skip, 2010-08-13) is credited, and not a complaint to your patch at
all, but you are welcome to comment on it if you feel like).

Everything in this test seem to require $PREREQ now (test_expect_success
always takes the 3-parameter form).  Does it suggest that we might want to
allow tests to define a "global prerequisite", e.g.

   GIT_TESTS_PREREQ="PERL"
   export GIT_TESTS_PREREQ

and make the traditional 2-parameter test_expect_success without an
explicit prerequisite take notice?  Would it let us not have to worry
about this kind of breakages?  Or is 9001 a very tiny minority oddball
that must have $PREREQ everywhere and such a test framework feature would
be an overkill?

More importantly, 9001 is all about send-email and we know upfront that we
want to skip everything when PERL prerequisite is not met.  Why not a
simple 

	if ! test_have_prereq PERL
        then
        	test_done
	fi

insufficient?

Who cares "skipped statistics"?  When one does not care about testing
send-email at all, why should one care how many tests on that program are
skipped?  I personally do not think this is worth the trouble, and am very
close (showing two fingers almost touching) to suggest reverting 57cd35e.

Please convince me otherwise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]