Re: Performance issue exposed by git-filter-branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Filename lengths: min 4 avg 50 median 51 max 178
Directory depths: min 1 avg 5 median 6 max 13

Pretty standard Python naming/hierarchy, really.

Thanks!
Ken

On Dec 17, 2010, at 5:01 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Ken Brownfield <krb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> cache_name_compare (and the presumed follow-ons of memcpy/sha/malloc/etc) is the major consumer.
> 
> Other people have given you alternative approaches. I'm just wondering
> if we can improve something here. cache_name_compare() is essentially
> memcmp() on two full paths. A tree-based index might help. How long
> are your file names on average? Are your trees deep?
> -- 
> Duy
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]