Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio, could you please drop patches 5-14 from the series; the first four patches > are the important ones and I'd rather they didn't get held up. Thanks! Have these four patches been Acked by interested parties? I think I saw 1/N and 2/N acked by Erik and 4/N acked by SSchuberth and J6t, but any words on 3/N? Not that I deeply care nor have environment to test changes to [3/N], but I am wondering if these need conditional definition to futureproof (e.g. what happens when the header you are using the definition _I64_MIN from, or some other headers, started defining these constats?). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html