Re: should git download missing objects?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:54:14PM CET, Shawn Pearce wrote:
> Alex Riesen <fork0@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Junio C Hamano, Sun, Nov 12, 2006 20:41:23 +0100:
> > > Since this is not everyday anyway, a far easier way would be to
> > > clone-pack from the upstream into a new repository, take the
> > > pack you downloaded from that new repository and mv it into your
> > > corrupt repository.  You can run fsck-objects to see if you got
> > > back everything you lost earlier.
> > 
> > I get into such a situation annoyingly often, by using
> > "git clone -l -s from to" and doing some "cleanup" in the
> > origin repository. For example, it happens that I remove a tag,
> > or a branch, and do a repack or prune afterwards. The related
> > repositories, which had "accidentally" referenced the pruned
> > objects become "corrupt", as you put it.
> >
> > At the moment, if I run into the situation, I copy packs/objects from
> > all repos I have (objects/info/alternates are useful here too), run a
> > fsck-objects/repack and hope nothing is lost. It works, as I almost
> > always have "accidental" backups somewhere, but is kind of annoying to
> > setup. A tool to do this job more effectively will be very handy (at
> > least, it wont have to copy gigabytes of data over switched windows
> > network. Not often, I hope. Not _so_ many gigabytes, possibly).

cg-fetch -f locally or over HTTP should be able to fix that up, if used
cleverly.

> One of my coworkers recently lost a single loose tree object.
> We suspect his Windows virus scanner deleted the file.  :-(
> 
> Copying the one bad object from another repository immediately fixed
> the breakage caused, but it was very annoying to not be able to run a
> "git fetch --missing-objects" or some such.  Fortunately it was just
> the one object and it was also still loose in another repository.
> scp was handy.  :-)

If it's over ssh, this is still where the heavily dusty (and heavily
"plumby") git-ssh-fetch command is useful, since it can get passed an
undocumented --recover argument and then it will fetch _all_ the objects
you are missing, not assuming anything.

Perhaps I should reintroduce support for git-ssh-fetch to cg-fetch to be
used in case of -f over SSH. But it would be silly if I did that and
next Git would remove the command from its suite. Junio, what's its life
expectancy? I guess this usage scenario is something to take into
account when thinking about removing it, I know that I wanted to get rid
of it in the past but now my opinion is changing.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]