Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 10:28:53PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Yeah, I think this is not _quite_ what people want in this area. A base
> requirement from past discussions, I think, is that the whole reflog of
> the deleted branch be saved rather than just the tip. And then "reflog
> show" would make a lot more sense on such saved reflogs.
I am more worried about stuff in branch.<name>.* that are discarded upon
"branch -d". Without the config items, you won't have a working:
$ branch -d frotz
$ branch --undelete frotz
$ git checkout frotz
$ git pull
I would say it is fine to discard old reflog for "frotz" branch and tell
users of --undelete that even though their branch is undeleted, the reflog
for it is already expired when they deleted it the first time, but it is
impossible to implement "branch --undelete" without stashing away stuff
other than reflog.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html