On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> +#define BRANCH_DELETION_LOG "DELETED-REFS" >>> + >> >> Should this special log be mentioned in git-update-ref.txt or >> gitrepository-layout.txt? > > Perhaps, but I wasn't sure if this patch itself is a good idea to begin > with. ÂNot the problem it tries to solve, but its approach. > > For example, this cannot be shown with "reflog show" or "log -g" due to > the way these frontends locate the reflog file to read (the logic wants to > have an underlying ref). > I think you have thought of this. What's wrong with keeping reflog when a branch is removed and appending "delete" line to the said reflog? I don't know how reflogs are managed, but those reflogs without associated branch will (or should) be cleaned when they are expired. I stick with this idea because I also want to archive old branches and am thinking those reflogs ending with "archive" line will be kept forever, or until I feel like digging up them again. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html