Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > That said, I have no strong objection to an implicit refresh in "git > reset" (performance-sensitive scripts should be using read-tree > directly anyway). Have you tried making that change to > builtin/reset.c? How does it perform in practice? I would be more worried about correctness impact such a patch may make when the index contains unmerged entries. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html