On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 07:41:00PM +0100, demerphq wrote: > Well, the counter arguments are: > > No back-compat layer for older gits. Tight binding to a particular git > - no availability of upgrades independent of upgrading git. I don't understand this one. Why do you need independent upgrades here? Since Git.pm comes with git core, the installed version of Git.pm should always match the installed version of git. > No > availability or review of the module on the standard venues for doing > so for Perl modules. CPAN, CPANTESTERS, smoke reports, etc. A module on CPAN has better tests for perl integration. A module in git-core has better tests for git integration. You trade one for the other. The question is which is more critical. IMHO, git-integration is more critical. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html