On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Will Palmer <wmpalmer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 21:19 +0100, Ãvar ArnfjÃrà Bjarmason wrote: >> Right, but is there an actual use case for people who are developing >> code to use something like git over p2p? Maybe I'm just being >> unimaginative, but I can't see a case where people are working on the >> same project and can't find a way to push/pull from each other using >> the existing methods. Especially since it's easy to sign up for free >> Git hosting and use something like Tor to pull/push from there. Or to >> set up your own git HTTP server on a Tor *.onion server. > > To me, the use-case wouldn't be because I /can't/ use existing methods, > it's because I /don't want to/ use existing methods :) > p2p tends to imply: > Â.. > Â- Downloads from multiple sources at the same time I would add "automatically" and it's a real case for me. I work on the same project on different machines (each of them has different resources that I need from time to time). So I clone to all the machines. If I make a fix in one machine, other machines should automatically fetch it. It's like a private p2p network with a single user. If I add another machine to the network, all nodes should be aware of it, without me doing "git remote add" on each node. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html