Heya, On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 20:16, Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > They touch the same code as 729ec9e (rebase --abort: do not update > branch ref), 7baf9c4 (rebase: support --verify) and 92c62a3 (Porcelain > scripts: Rewrite cryptic "needs update" error message). However, it is > only 7baf9c4 that would have to be more or less redone if I did not > base the patch set on it. Do I understand correctly that I should > therefore have based them directly off of 7baf9c4? Yes, I think that'd be preferable, unless Junio disagrees? > I suppose it is not worth resending this time. Tell me if you think > otherwise. Yeah, you can just wait to rebase with the next iteration. -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html