Re: [RFC/PATCH 03/18] usage: implement error_errno() the same way as die_errno()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> die_errno() is very useful, but sometimes we don't want to
> die after printing an error message and the error message
> from errno. So let's implement error_errno() that does the
> same thing as die_errno() except that it calls
> error_routine() instead of die_routine().

If this were "error_errno() is to error() as die_errno() is to die(); iow,
error_errno() does the same thing as error() but in addition shows the
errno information", it might be a good thing, but the above makes it sound
like you did something different.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]