Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2010, #03; Wed, 24)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 11/25/2010 10:45, schrieb Ãvar ArnfjÃrà Bjarmason:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:16, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> It is getting ridiculously painful to keep re-resolving the conflicts with
>> other topics in flight, even with the help with rerere.
>>
>> Needs a bit more minor work to get the basic code structure right.
> 
> Still waiting on input about what exactly needs to be fixed. See
> <AANLkTikw0+FGJmj7C0B9J_3ZVXrbqCw+UzyP3sqfyVdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Is there anything else than that (the builtin.h includes) that you
> think needs work?

One open question was why you do not want to move 'LIB_OBJS += gettext.o'
away from the LIB_OBJS section down to the configuration evaluation
section, i.e., why gettext.o would be different from block-sha1/sha1.o.

-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]