"J.H." <warthog9@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > While I don't disagree, being able to support other caching systems > would be nice, we have this now, it's tested and it works. I'd argue > this is a step 1, step 2 case at this point. I would have to agree; getting some cache layer that is known to work (you are battle testing your updates on a busy site of yours as you develop, right?) early, quick and dirty with minimum changes, is more beneficial than waiting for a large rewrite thats "gets it perfect this time". > I'm currently working from on top of Jakub's last tree, though I've got > some questions about his reasoning on a few things now that I've been > digging into it. Thanks both for keeping the ball rolling. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html