Re: groff .ft command use in asciidoc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 15:40 -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 03:34:53PM -0500, Drew Northup wrote:
> 
> > > RHEL5 has asciidoc8, but docbook-xsl 1.69, which means it still needs
> > > ASCIIDOC_ROFF enabled. RHEL6 is just out last week. So we are
> > > technically breaking at least RHEL5 people (along with anybody with
> > > ancient systems) until they tweak their knobs.
> > 
> > Once I imported the DocBook XML XSL 4.5 files into my local cache it
> > seemed to make the man pages just fine on my RHEL5 machine even with the
> > posted patch applied.
> > 
> > [root@host ~]# rpm -qi asciidoc
> > Name        : asciidoc                     Relocations: (not relocatable)
> > Version     : 8.6.3                             Vendor: Dag Apt Repository, http://dag.wieers.com/apt/
> > Release     : 1.el5.rf                      Build Date: Thu 18 Nov 2010 08:35:22 AM EST
> > ...
> > [root@host ~]# rpm -qi docbook-utils
> > Name        : docbook-utils                Relocations: (not relocatable)
> > Version     : 0.6.14                            Vendor: Red Hat, Inc.
> > Release     : 5.1                           Build Date: Wed 12 Jul 2006 03:55:00 AM EDT
> > 
> > I didn't inspect each and every one for errors, but I didn't see any
> > problems in the ones I did look at.
> 
> I think the updated XSL files are what's making it work. The stock
> docbook xsl files are:
> 
>   $ yum list | grep docbook-style-xsl
>   docbook-style-xsl.noarch   1.69.1-5.1 rhel-x86_64-server-5

Interestingly enough, without the updated XSL files it seemed to be
working ok, it was just ungodly slow and kicking up a ton of warnings
(it was trying to fetch them off of the hosting web server at such a
high rate it was being limited out).

> and I don't know that we can assume anyone has updated them. However, I
> don't actually build git on my RHEL machines, so I could might be wrong.
> 
> All that being said, I am willing to accept RHEL5 as collateral damage
> if the new defaults Just Work for the majority of other platforms.
> 
> -Peff

I don't personally see this as a stopper. After all, asciidoc wasn't a
default install either.

-- 
-Drew Northup N1XIM
   AKA RvnPhnx on OPN
________________________________________________
"As opposed to vegetable or mineral error?"
-John Pescatore, SANS NewsBites Vol. 12 Num. 59

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]