Does it make sense to pull from mirror? (Re: [BUG?] push to mirrior interferes with parallel operations)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:58:11 -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> It seems to me there are really two kinds of mirrors: one where you will
> fetch everything from the remote, and one where you will push everything
> to the remote.
> 
> You have the latter kind, and the fetch refspec is just causing
> problems. Removing it would solve not only this issue, but also the fact
> that you would never want to run "git fetch backup", even accidentally,
> in your repo, as it would overwrite your local work.

Accidentally did it already. Fortunately it just died with something like
    "refusing to pull to checked out branch of non-bare repository"
and did nothing at all.
 
> So I think we need --mirror=push, or something similar.

Does it *ever* make sense to have a non-bare pull mirror. I think it does
not.

-- 
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]