On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:22:06PM +0700, Nguyán ThÃi Ngác Duy wrote:
> I lost in my branches again while looking for a topic that I feel like
> working on tonight. Too old branches are out of question.
>
> This throwaway patch demonstrates the idea. I should have looked into
> reflog for this kind of information, but my laziness won over me.
I do something similar, but rather than using mtime, I sort by
authordate, which for-each-ref supports already. In fact, the script I
use is:
-- >8 --
#!/bin/sh
format='%(refname:short)'
sortby=refname
set -- $(getopt vt "$@")
while test $# -gt 0; do
case "$1" in
-v) format='%(refname:short) %(subject)' ;;
-t) sortby=-authordate ;;
--) break ;;
*) echo >&2 "unknown option: $1"; exit 100 ;;
esac
shift
done
git for-each-ref --sort=$sortby --format="$format" refs/heads |
egrep '^[a-z]{2,3}/' |
perl -pe '
s/(\S+) /$1 . " " x (22 - length($1))/e; # line up subjects
s/^(.{79}).*/$1/; # truncate long lines
'
-- 8< --
It might be nice if git-branch supported the same sortby that
for-each-ref does.
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html