Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > O.K. This one introduced new feature, and wasn't needed for earlier > accepted patch (output empty patches) to have sense. And it is rc1 > phase... I personally do not mind minor gitweb 'feature' updates in -rc cycle, just like I am planning to see if there are gitk updates I haven't pulled from Paulus (I think there is at least one patch from last month or so), unless the changes do not break it so badly. > By the way, where I can find proper specifiction of unified diff format? > Do I understand correctly that bot from and to ranges can be without > number of lines part if it simplifies to 0? When Linus did apply.c and I did diff.c, we primarily worked off of sources to GNU patch. There is a POSIX draft proposal now. http://www.opengroup.org/austin/mailarchives/ag-review/msg02077.html See also updates about the proposal. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/29331/focus=29389 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html