On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am not sure I agree with the reasoning of this patch, by the way. ÂA > cherry-pick is an event that breaks the life of the patch, so it may even > be a sensible thing to do to express "the above sign-off chain shows who > were involved in the original commit; I am cherry-picking it out of > context, and these people do not have much to do with the result" with a > blank line on both sides of the "cherry picked" line, like this: > > Â Â Â ÂA concise summary of the change > > Â Â Â ÂA detailed description of the change, why it is needed, what > Â Â Â Âwas broken and why applying this is the best course of action. > > Â Â Â ÂSigned-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Â Â Â ÂSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Â Â Â Â(cherry picked from commit 9d8117e72bf453dd9d85e0cd322ce4a0f8bccbc0) > > Â Â Â ÂSigned-off-by: Back Porter <backporter@xxxxxxxxxxx> Or perhaps prefix them with Original-, inspired by email headers, and which I think makes it even more clear that the sob lines don't apply to the new commit. Â Â Â ÂOriginal-Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Â Â Â ÂOriginal-Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cherry-picked-from: 9d8117e72bf453dd9d85e0cd322ce4a0f8bccbc0 Â Â Â ÂSigned-off-by: Back Porter <backporter@xxxxxxxxxxx> j. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html