Re: [PATCHv6 06/23] notes.h/c: Propagate combine_notes_fn return value to add_note() and beyond

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 14 November 2010, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Thiago Farina wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>               die("confused: combine_notes_overwrite failed");
> > 
> > This message looks like more a debug information. Could it be
> > rewritten to be more user friendly / more informative?
> 
> Sverre mentioned the same thing.  The intent is the same as the existing
> 
> 		die("should not happen, someone must be hit on the forehead");
> 
> --- i.e., to provoke bug reports if it happens, without the appearance
> of begging. :)
> 
> So how about:
> 
> 		die("BUG: combine_notes_overwrite failed");
> 
> Something involving assert() could also work, but that tends to be
> a bit ugly.

Agreed. I've rewritten the die() messages in the following v6.1 patches.


...Johan

-- 
Johan Herland, <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
www.herland.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]