Re: win2k/cygwin cannot handle even moderately sized packs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



So the problem is probably memory fragmentation.

probably.

You might have more joy if you allocated one HUGE chunk immediately on
startup to use for the pack, and then kept re-using that chunk.

Well, it is not _one_ chunk. The windows/cygwin abomin...combination
may take an issue with this: it seem to copy complete address space
at fork, which even for such a small packs I have here takes system
down lightly (yes, I tried it).

Incidentally, is there a way to cut a big pack into a lot of smaller packs?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]