Re: [PATCH] teach update-index --refresh about --data-unchanged

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:37:40AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Pete Wyckoff <pw@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>> When a repository has been copied with rsync, or cloned using
>> a volume manager, the index can be incorrect even though the
>> data is unchanged.  This new flag tells update-index --refresh
>> that it is not necessary to reread the data contents.
>
> I know our traditional attitude towards the plumbing commands have been
> "give them long enough rope and let users hang themselves", but this
> particular rope feels a bit too long for my taste.

Pete, I think you mentioned the possibility of a special-case tool for
contrib/ that just updates the inode, device number, and ctime fields?
That sounds a little less worrying to use, as plumbing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]