Re: [PATCH 03/10] Change remote tracking to remote-tracking in non-trivial places

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 00:40 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Matthieu Moy wrote:
> >
> >> What I'm trying to do here is really to achieve consistancy. If
> >> something has a name, let's use the same name everywhere.
> >
> > Okay, but can it at least not be part of a patch that does something
> > simpler (only adding dashes)?
> 
> OK, I'll do that.
> 
> > I'm not sure why you don't like the idea of rewording it, but
> > that's fine ---
> 
> Not that I don't like the idea. I'm just saying that my patch makes
> the situation better that it used to. No objection if other people
> want to make it even better later (but I probably won't have time
> soon).

I was contemplating taking some time to look more closely at this
document myself. This patch does not get in the way of my doing so.

-- 
-Drew Northup N1XIM
   AKA RvnPhnx on OPN
________________________________________________
"As opposed to vegetable or mineral error?"
-John Pescatore, SANS NewsBites Vol. 12 Num. 59

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]