Re: git bug? + question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 04 November 2006 20:05, Shawn Pearce wrote:
> Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >  	git checkout origin/vmdvt
> > 
> > should create a new local branch refs/heads/vmdvt which forks
> > from remotes/origin/vmdvt (and abort with
> > error if refs/heads/vmdvt already exists without being the local
> > development branch for remotes/origin/vmdvt)
> 
> Yes, that would work for our workflow.  I won't try to speak about
> anyone else's.
> 
> I'd also say that if the local branch (refs/heads/vmdvt) exists and
> if `git pull . origin/vmdvt` is going to be a fast-forward that the
> fast-forward should happen during the checkout.  That way after the
> checkout is complete you really do have what is in origin/vmdvt,
> but are sitting on a local branch.

Hmmm... But you are changing the tip of a local development branch,
which is probably not always the thing we want.

Thinking about it, we should always error out if a proposed branch
name for a read-only branch already exists.

Josef

> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]