Matthieu Moy wrote: > --- a/Documentation/glossary-content.txt > +++ b/Documentation/glossary-content.txt > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ to point at the new commit. > you have. In such these cases, you do not make a new <<def_merge,merge>> > <<def_commit,commit>> but instead just update to his > revision. This will happen frequently on a > - <<def_tracking_branch,tracking branch>> of a remote > + <<def_remote_tracking_branch,remote-tracking branch>> of a remote > <<def_repository,repository>>. Why not keep the anchor name, like so: <<def_tracking_branch,remote-tracking branch>> (for brevity and to keep old links valid)? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html