Re: should Documentation/howto/setup-git-server-over-http.txt be marked obsolete?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Not everybody uses gitolite, and I do not think we have broken the dumb
>> HTTP support (however broken the original was ;-) to render the document
>> obsolete.
>
> My apologies; I didn't realise my mail would come across like that.

Oh no need for that; I didn't realise -my- response would, either ;-)

> I just followed "man git-http-backend" and it all worked.  Should there be more?

No; that would mean the next step would be (as you suggested)...

>>  - When the above two is done, insert one line "This describes an older
>>   way; see <<insert the name of the other document here>> for insn to set
>>   up an experimental smart HTTP server" at the beginning of the original
>>   document.

... this one.

I trust you can take care of the gitolite documentation side ;-)

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]