So an annoying feature of bash appears to be that it won't really provide completion on backtick'd commands. For example I can complete "git merge-base ma" just fine as is, but if I toss it into backticks say "git update-ref M `git merge-base ma" then I can't complete "ma" out to "master" anymore. A little bit of debugging appears to show that bash is invoking the completion hook for the outermost command; that is we are looking for parameters for update-ref and not merge-base. I think I could rewrite a good part of git-completion.bash to support this use. But it won't work for "echo `git merge-base ma" as the outermost command is echo and we don't have a Git completion hook registered for that command. This is really annoying when it comes to less contrived examples. I find myself forming odd pipelines with commit-tree, update-ref, mktree, lstree, sed, rev-list, etc. and always keep bumping up on the limitations of git-completion.bash. Any suggestions? How often do bash users try to use backticks to call Git commands, only to find bash isn't being as helpful as it should be? -- Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html