Re: GIT as binary repository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > BTW: how are the current tree objects structured ? Is there always
> > one big tree object representing the whole tree or can it be
> > splitted hierachically ?
> 
> Trees in the repository are split hierarchically, but its a flat list
> in the dircache/index file (aka $GIT_DIR/index).

Good. That should allow optimizations for large trees w/o
having to change object formats.

What about splitted blobs ? Is this supported by the object
format right now ?


cu
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/

 phone:  +49 36207 519931  email: weigelt@xxxxxxxx
 mobile: +49 151 27565287  icq:   210169427         skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]