Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Speaking of which, it is not clear to me that core.worktree should >> fall under the forbidden case discussed above. ÂIf it does, what is >> the point of making it configurable? > > I was not the one who introduced core.worktree, so I can't really > tell. Maybe less keystrokes? Yeah, it seems you're totally right. :( So in clarifying the semantics, core.worktree without GIT_DIR should be forbidden. But consider this a feature request. By the time core.worktree has been read, it is obvious what the GIT_DIR was supposed to be: References: - v0 (GIT_TOP_DIR): http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/38382 - v1 (GIT_WORK_DIR): http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/41902 - v2 (GIT_WORK_TREE): http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/42416 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html