Hi Stephen, Stephen Bash writes: > > From: "Will Palmer" <wmpalmer@xxxxxxxxx> > > I was under the impression that there > > would be one "one-to-one" mapping branch (which would never be checked > > out), containing the history of /, and that the "real" git branches, > > tags, etc, would be based on the trees originally referenced by the root > > checkout, with git-notes (or similar) being used to track the weirdness > > in mappings. > > Admittedly I'm not in the inner circle, but this is the first time > I've heard the idea. Do hang out on the development channel - a lot of stuff cooks there :) > It's certainly intriguing. In this case would > the one-to-one branch include the full SVN repository history (all > projects), or would svn-fe/git-fast-import filter down to > subdirectories of interest? Full history. Atleast that's what I was thinking about sometime ago. > Along those lines I can contribute the following data point: my > initial fast-import repository weighs in at 1.3G, while after my > scripts run the final product is 659M (and no, they are not hard > linking to each other). Unfortunately I don't have a good > accounting of the size difference (obviously some is filtering down > to a single SVN project). Yeah, David reported similar statistics after repacking the ASF repository. -- Ram -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html