Re: git bug? + question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:29:45PM -0500, Shawn Pearce wrote:

> Nack.  I'd rather see the entries added/removed from .git/config when
> the branch is created/deleted, just like the ref and the reflog are
> created/deleted.  It makes behavior more consistent for the user
> and it is mostly self documenting...

If we go this route, please consider updating .git/auto-branch-config or
similar, and adding the functionality to include that file into
.git/config.

I think the concept of automagically munging a user-editable config file
is problematic, especially when users might manage those files with
version control or other systems.

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]