Re: [RFC] Hidden refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:42:41AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > Yeah, I believe "." at the front of a directory component is explicitly
>> > forbidden by check_ref_format. I don't recall whether there was a
>> > specific rationale, or whether it was simply a can of worms we didn't
>> > want to explore.
>> 
>> Is "log foo...bar" a symmetric difference between foo and bar, or is it an
>> assymmetric one from foo and .bar?
>
> Thanks, I was sure there was a simple example of how it would make
> things ambiguous, but for some reason I couldn't think of one.

Of course, it points at an existing bug as well.  --- the example could
mean an asymmetric difference from foo. to bar ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]