Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 00:38, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> At any rate, that is not needed for the current version of svn-fe, >> is it? ÂSo maybe it would make sense to strip down the patch to just >> allow >> >> Â Â Â Âcat <blob> > > Do we want some sort of type indicator to make it easier to extend? So > "cat blob <blob>"? I'm not convinced it's needed. cat-file does that to allow peeling references: git cat-file tree v1.7.1 vs git cat-file tag v1.7.1 But the "cat" name might be too valuable namespace to reserve for only this. I have no strong preference either way. Maybe the command should be named "cat-blob". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html