On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Eric Sunshine <ericsunshine@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/10/2010 9:20 AM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: >> >> From: Mike Pape<dotzenlabs@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Syslog does not usually exist on Windows, so we implement our own >> using Window's ReportEvent mechanism. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mike Pape<dotzenlabs@xxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund<kusmabite@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> +void syslog(int priority, const char *fmt, const char *arg) >> +{ >> + WORD logtype; >> + >> + if (!ms_eventlog) >> + return; >> + >> + if (strcmp(fmt, "%s")) { >> + warning("format string of syslog() not implemented"); >> + return; >> + } > > It is not exactly clear what the intention is here. Is this trying to say > that no formatting directives are allowed in 'fmt' or what? The simple case > it is actually checking (where 'fmt' is solely '%s') could easily be handled > manually, as could more complex formats. > This is the result of the feed-back in v1, where we tried to implement all format strings. But that turned out to be very complex (due to the lack of a portable va_copy()) and since we control all call-sites for syslog and already only use "%s" as the format, it should be OK. Perhaps that should be mentioned in the commit message... >> + /* >> + * ReportEvent() doesn't handle strings containing %n, where n is >> + * an integer. Such events must be reformatted by the caller. >> + */ >> + ReportEventA(ms_eventlog, >> + logtype, >> + 0, >> + 0, >> + NULL, >> + 1, >> + 0, >> + (const char **)&arg, >> + NULL); > > The comment about '%n' seems to be warning about a potential problem but > does not actually protect against it. Should this issue be handled? > This is again an issue that was discussed in the first round. ReportEvent() CANNOT report a string containing "%n" (where n is an integer). And while we could probably try to work around it by inserting a space or something, and I don't think we ever were able to find a case where we could report a string containing "%n" in the first place... Are you suggesting that we report an error when we can't report the string correctly? We could do that, but I'm not sure how the end-user would benefit from that. ReportEvent is used to report errors (unless the --verbose flag has been specified), and reporting that we can't present an error message strike me as a bit confusing... Even the corrupted error message is probably better :P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html