On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:56:02PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>
>> Moreover, wouldn't it make sense to make 'git merge' = 'git merge
>> @{u}'?
>
> Isn't that what 'git pull' does? Especially after using 'git
> fetch'?
No, it hits the network again: git pull = git fetch + git merge @{u}
If I already did 'git fetch' why should I do it again?
> I prefer 'git merge' as one of the few git commands without magic
> behavior and DWIMery.
There's no magic involved, it's just what you would expect, what else
should 'git merge' (without arguments) do?
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html