Re: [PATCH] fast-import: Allow filemodify to set the root

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 10/7/2010 22:28, schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> 
>> This means nothing to me
> 
> Sorry for the lack of clarity.  Probably I should have just said:
> 
> | For a command (like filter-branch --subdirectory-filter) that wants
> | to commit a lot of trees that already exist in the object db, writing
> | undeltified objects as loose files only to repack them later can
> | involve a significant amount[*] of overhead.

1. But when an object already exists in the db, it won't be written again,
will it?

2. Even though fast-import puts all (new) objects into a pack file, the
pack is heavily sub-optimal, and you should repack -f anyway. So what's
the point? Only to avoid a loose object?

(I'm not saying that the patch is unwanted, but only that the
justification is still not sufficiently complete.)

-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]