On Tuesday 05 October 2010 16:29:50 you wrote: > A newbie colleague asked why: "git push <branch>" didn't work. > > Although I know that "git push <repo> <branch>" is the correct > syntax, I think that he has a point. If branch.<branch>.remote > is defined it seems unambiguous to me. > > So I can't see any reason NOT to dwimify > > git push <branch> Isn't that syntax reserved for remotes? for example: git push origin I feel like it would be a bad idea to have these 2 types of invocations overlap in syntax like that.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.