On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Maybe 'git pull --all' could be taught to eventually do this? ÂThat
>> would be incompatible with its current behavior of fetching everything
>> and merging some random branch, but I don't think anyone is relying
>> on that.
>
> I vaguely recall that we had discussions to disable "git pull --all",
> which most likely is a mistake?
I believe this use-case is valid:
* The user wants *all* his remote tracking branches to point to the
latest branch head in all the repos in the case the can be
fast-forwarded, and in the case they can't, print an error and
continue with the rest.
Right now I would have to do 'git fetch --all' go to every remote
tracking branch, and do 'git merge @{upstream}'.
Do you have a better idea how to achieve that instead of 'git pull --all'?
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html