Re: git bug? + question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/3/06, Martin Waitz <tali@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think the most intuitive thing for pull would be to fetch into
remotes/<remotename>/* and then to merge
remotes/<remotename>/<currentbranch>.

Yes as the default branch to merge instead the first line, the problem
is that it changes the current behaviour. But I think the most
intuitive thing would be to record the branch it is based off at the
branch creation time. Something similar to my patch:

Oct 17 [PATCHv2] git-branch: Set branch properties
Message-ID: <87y7rf80es.fsf@xxxxxxxxx>

Note that it is for the "old" git-branch.sh.

Santi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]