On 11/3/06, Martin Waitz <tali@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think the most intuitive thing for pull would be to fetch into remotes/<remotename>/* and then to merge remotes/<remotename>/<currentbranch>.
Yes as the default branch to merge instead the first line, the problem is that it changes the current behaviour. But I think the most intuitive thing would be to record the branch it is based off at the branch creation time. Something similar to my patch: Oct 17 [PATCHv2] git-branch: Set branch properties Message-ID: <87y7rf80es.fsf@xxxxxxxxx> Note that it is for the "old" git-branch.sh. Santi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html