On 10/04/2010 12:39 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Heh, are people who send patches with only S-o-b by your definition not > testing their patches at all ;-)? As far as I can tell, your patch > applied to 'next' will break t9001 rather badly. > > I agree there is a bug that you are trying to address in the series by > Stephen that keeps adding To: address that is read from an earlier output > of format-patch created with its --to option, but I do not think this is a > right fix. Have you tested sending a series with a plain format-patch > output without extraneous To:, Cc: and such headers? > > A normal send-email session takes the recipient address from either --to > or interactively upfront, and then use those addresses kept in @to > variable in the loop, repeatedly. I do not see anything in your patch to > avoid losing these addresses. Junio, Stephan, Ya! my patch wasn't good enough. I just tried to solve it the way it was done for cc. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html