Hi,
Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 13:33, Tomas Carnecky <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> To test this
>> approach I created a simple remote helper for svn.
>
> I guess it suffices as a POC, but I'd have preferred to see
> collaboration with the people working on git-remote-svn instead
> (cc-ed).
Just a quick note: if this approach gets a working remote helper
in the hands of users faster, I'm all for it.
My only concern is the name: if it is not compatible the planned
remote helper from the summer of code project, they should probably
get different names. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the main
differences are:
- this is scripted and uses local svn working copy operations; the
soc project is in C and uses remote access ("replay")
- this uses the nice ls-remote output etc. Ram, do you think this
would be easy to use for remote-svn?
So, not many differences. Maybe we can standardize the interface
and consider them alternate implementations?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html