Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> CHANGES IN OUTPUT: Before, if ref in refs/tags was tag pointing to >> commit we used committer epoch as epoch for ref, and used tagger epoch >> as epoch only for tag pointing to object of other type. If ref in >> refs/tags was commit, we used committer epoch as epoch for ref (see >> parse_ref; we sorted in gitweb by 'epoch' field). > > I think that behaviour was inconsistent and just silly. Using > creatordate consistently is better so if the code generates what > the commit log claims to, I think that is fine (I haven't looked > at it deeply yet). Well, I _could_ argue on the former behaviour, namely that we use committerdate when available (when ref points to commit, or to tag pointing to commit), and if it is not available we use taggerdate if possible. The latter is that we use always "creation" date. -- Jakub Narebski Poland - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html