Linus Torvalds wrote: > The real problem is that maintainers often pick random - and not at > all stable - points for their development to begin with. They just > pick some random "this is where Linus -git tree is today", and do > their development on top of that. THAT is the problem - they are > unaware that there's some nasty bug in that version. Maybe they do this because they read it in the Git user-manual. Fix the manual to give them better guidance. Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> --- diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt index fecc4eb..66a249d 100644 --- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt +++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt @@ -2171,11 +2171,14 @@ $ git push mytree release Now to apply some patches from the community. Think of a short snappy name for a branch to hold this patch (or related group of -patches), and create a new branch from the current tip of Linus's -branch: +patches), and create a new branch from a recent stable tag of +Linus's branch. Picking a stable base for your branch will: +1) help you: by avoiding inclusion of unrelated and perhaps lightly +tested changes +2) help future bug hunters that use "git bisect" to find problems ------------------------------------------------- -$ git checkout -b speed-up-spinlocks origin +$ git checkout -b speed-up-spinlocks v2.6.35 ------------------------------------------------- Now you apply the patch(es), run some tests, and commit the change(s). If -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html