Another way to compare tools: is it possible to transfer full history?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have seen lots of comparisons between source control tools, 
but have not found a comparison that would explain the fundamental differences 
and similarities in a way that would really let me choose. 
So I decided to try a new approach: if one tries to transfer the full history 
of an application or a larger product/project, which features can I rely on 
finding in any decently recent tool?

Let's start from Git vs. Mercurial: is it possible to move the whole history 
of an application (with or without submodules) from Git to Mercurial? 
>From Mercurial to Git? 
If it is not always possible, what is the feature that might completely 
prevent the whole attempt? If partial transfer is possible, what information 
might be missing in the result?

I am not interested in whether it is easy or fast in practice. 
I am only interested in the concepts and finding equivalent classes 
for the tools or at least their core concepts.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]