Re: git am should recognize >From

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Aside: it seems that many format-patch users are not using it to
> generate an mbox with a template message, as originally intended;

Myself included.  I don't like other things sending mail for me outside of
my normal mail client, since my normal mail client does lots of other
things (like know what From address to use, save copies of outgoing mail,
etc.).

> instead, they just write a cover letter and attach the generated patches
> to it. Are we not advertising the "am --scissors" facility[1] well
> enough?

That seems like a bad substitute for real MIME structure.  My experience
is that patches as actual MIME attachments fare much better and are much
less likely to be mangled when getting to the committer than patches
inlined in the body of a message.  (Yes, this is a 180 degree reversal
from the situation about ten years ago.)

Speaking of git am features, it would also be lovely if git am would
recognize and accept the format produced by git show, since a lot of
beginning Git users tend towards git show output instead of git
format-patch.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@xxxxxxxxxx)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]