Sergey Vlasov wrote: >> Perhaps just don't remove log when branch is deleted. I tend for example >> to be careful when reordering commits on a branch, and use git branch -f >> instead of deleting and recreating branch to not lose reflog. > > Keeping the reflog does not help - reflog entries are not refs, and do > not keep the referenced objects live in the repository. Therefore old > objects will be lost when the repository is repacked and pruned. Well, now to reorder and choose which commits on branch to save, and optionally also rebase, I use $ git branch tmp $ git branch -f <branch> <upstream> $ git checkout <branch> $ git cherry-pick tmp~<n> ... $ git branch -D tmp > Also, the reflog really must be deleted together with the ref itself - > otherwise it may cause a file/directory conflict when another ref is > created. Of course, if the ref is renamed instead of deleting, the > corresponding reflog may be renamed too. There is currently no command to rename branch (and rename reflog). It would be nice if git-branch could also rename branch (and reflog). -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html