>Brandon Casey <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> From: Brandon Casey <drafnel@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Since 'git describe' does not append -dirty to the version string it >> produces when untracked files exist in the working directory of the main >> repository, it should not do so for submodules either. >> >> Add --ignore-submodules=untracked to the call to diff-index which is used >> to decide whether or not the '-dirty' string is necessary. >> >> Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > >Hmm, this changes the behaviour in a big way but it probably is for the >better. At least it is consistent with the recent fixes to the >interaction between diff and submodules. Hmm, by default the diff family considers submodules with untracked files as dirty unless configured otherwise (and AFAICS the recent fixes to the interaction between diff and submodule were options to configure your own default). So when git status tells you the subodule is modified, e.g. because of an untracked file, I would expect git describe to add '-dirty' to its output when requested. To get rid of that I would expect you either fix the .gitignore of the submodule or configure that you don't care about untracked files in submodules at all (either only for this submodule or in the config). So if I didn't misunderstand something here I would rather vote against this change, git describe should append a '-dirty' when git status would show modifications, no? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html