Re: [PATCH] Teach receive-pack how to keep pack files when unpacklooseobjects = 0.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Because that approach assumes recieve-pack and unpack-objects
>> and index-pack are from the same vintage (otherwise your
>> receive-pack would need to have a way to see if unpack-objects
>> and index-pack would grok --pack_header argument), we could even
>> get away without passing the pack version if we wanted to.
>...
> BTW I think we do need to pass the pack version in the option.

We are in agreement; I mentioned "we could ... if we wanted to"
because I wanted to see if you are paying attention ;-).


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]