Re: [PATCH/RFC] Restructure some of the checkout opts.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@xxxxxx> writes:

> Am 05.09.2010 14:09, schrieb Jared Hance:
>> Previously, most opts in `builtin.checkout.c' had been an instance of
>> `struct checkout_opts'. It appears that some of the opts that were
>> perhaps added later were not in the struct. Move them into the struct
>> in order to maintain consistency.
>
> Hm, they aren't used outside of cmd_checkout() (as the other members
> are), so maybe it is ok that they aren't in the struct?

Correct.  I do not think they are outside the structure because they are
overlooked.

They simply do not make sense outside the context of "builtin/checkout.c"
where "struct checkout" is used (e.g. what would patch-mode possibly mean
in the context of "builtin/apply" where the struct is used to check out a
path that is not checked out to the working tree).  Moving them into the
structure would thus make no sense and _will_ confuse people.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]