Re: WARNING: THIS PATCH CAN BREAK YOUR REPO, was Re: [PATCH 2/3] Only repack active packs by skipping over kept packs.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:59:03PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jan Harkes <jaharkes@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > The following patch does fix the problem Nicolas reported, but for some
> > reason I'm still getting only 102 objects (only tags and the commits
> > they refer to?) with your test.
> 
> One potential downside of this is that this makes an obscure but
> useful "gitk --unpacked" useless (robs performance).
> 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/19197/focus=19207

If I use 'git fetch' followed later on by a 'git fetch -k', the result
from --unpacked would not include the unpacked objects created by the
first fetch. Although it may have been fast, it seems to be somewhat
counter-intuitive.

> But other than that, I think it is an Ok change.  The original
> semantics of --unpacked (with or without "pretend as if objects
> in this pack are loose") were, eh, "strange".

Do you need a resend with a proper 'Signed-Off-By' line?

Jan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]