On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 09:47:19PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > Q: is git a "distributed source control system"? > A: yeees, but the "distribution" part has to be done the hard way, > by setting up servers, forcing developers and users to configure > git to use those [single-point-of-failure] servers. so it's > "more correct" to say that git is a "distributable" source control > system. Is typing the command "git daemon" on the command line really that hard? For bonus points it could register with Avahi (i.e., the Zeroconf protocol), which would make it easier to set up adhoc sharing arrangements. But if that's your goal, I'd suggest making "git daemon" simpler to set up --- since it's pretty trivial to set up as it is. I'd then suggest adding to "git gui" an option to allow a user to browse local git servers who have advertised themselves using the Zeroconf protocol and do a git fetch from the local server. But if you want to work on peer2peer because it's "cool", feel free. But I suspect telling people that all if you have to do is run "git daemon" on one machine, and using "git gui" to browse through the available git servers on the other machines, it really isn't going to get any easier.... - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html